Case 3308893/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Miller v Burger Priest Ipswich — 2023
- Case reference
- 3308893/2022
- Decision date
- 10 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Miller
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 2 June 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss S Miller an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why her claim should not be struck out under rule 37. The stated grounds were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's orders dated 30 January 2023 and 27 April 2023, and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing. Employment Judge Graham therefore struck out the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying merits and does not award any remedy.
The judgment was sent to the parties on 10 August 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The extracted judgment text does not state the substantive claim type, but the gov.uk listing for this case identifies it as Unlawful Deduction from Wages. The claim was struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with tribunal orders and because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.