Case 3308905/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Vidler v Your Choice (Barnet) Ltd and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3308905/2023
- Decision date
- 5 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs E Vidler
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns the claimant's application for interim relief in case numbers 3308905/2023 and 3308906/2023. The hearing took place at Watford on 3 October 2023 before Employment Judge Bansal sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person, accompanied by her sister Beatrice Vernaca, and the respondents were represented by Mr O Holloway of counsel.
The tribunal refused the claimant's application for interim relief. No substantive reasoning is set out in the written record beyond that outcome. The judgment also records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note at the end of the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only an application for interim relief. The claimant's application was refused; the underlying substantive claim is not identified in this written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the .
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.