Case 3308908/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Swain v Jennings Caravan Site Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3308908/2023
- Decision date
- 10 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Swain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that Mr M Swain's claim against Jennings Caravan Site Ltd was struck out. On 28 March 2025 the tribunal sent a letter giving the claimant until 4 April 2025 to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out on the grounds that the proceedings had been conducted in a scandalous, unreasonable or vexatious manner, that the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order of 20 September 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued, and for the reasons set out by the respondent in emails dated 13 January 2025.
The claimant did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim, and the hearing listed to start on 30 April 2025 did not take place. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claim or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause(s) of action; it only records that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.