Case 3308919/2022 · Employment Tribunal
P Bara v Anchor Recruitment (Agency) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3308919/2022
- Decision date
- 21 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Lewis Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
P Bara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of any substantive claim. By a letter dated 20 April 2023, it gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's order dated 9 January 2023 and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge R Lewis ordered that the claim be struck out. The judgment was dated 20 June 2023 and sent to the parties on 21 July 2023.
No remedy was awarded because the claim was struck out before any merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying cause of action. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the order dated 9 January 2023, did not actively pursue the claim, and did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing after the letter dated 20 April 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.