Case 3308920/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Barratt & Others v Kershaw Mechanical Services Limited (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 3308920/2022
- Decision date
- 1 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Barratt & Others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment by consent in multiple claims against Kershaw Mechanical Services Limited (In Administration). The tribunal recorded that the administrators had granted permission for the claims to proceed and to lift the moratorium on 4 October 2022, subject to conditions agreed by the claimants' representative on 28 September 2022. It found that the claimants were employed by the respondent and that the claim for a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay remuneration to the claimants for a protected period of 60 days beginning on 1 April 2022, which it identified as the date on which the first of the dismissals took effect. It also recorded that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996 applied to the award, that any payments made by the respondent would be paid as an unsecured dividend subject to the usual preferential debts rules, and that the claimants agreed not to rank the sums as an expense of the administration or any later liquidation.
The judgment stated that the claimants had no other Employment Tribunal claims against the respondent. It also recorded that there would be no order as to costs or interest, and that each party would bear its own costs in the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The judgment was by consent. No separate cash figure is stated in the text; the tribunal ordered remuneration for a 60-day protected period. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 189 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.