Case 3308960/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Udoh v B&M Retail Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308960/2023
- Decision date
- 4 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Udoh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints should not be struck out. The issue was whether the claimant had the qualifying service needed for those claims, and the tribunal found the claimant had not made sufficient representations against strike out.
It therefore struck out both complaints under rule 37(1)(a) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013. The judgment records that the claimant's other claims, including discrimination and wrongful dismissal matters, remained listed.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the complaint because the claimant had not been continuously employed for two years at the date of dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the complaint for the same reason. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Rules 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.