Case 3308969/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Niksic v Atalian Servest Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3308969/2022
- Decision date
- 10 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Niksic
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claimant's application for interim relief at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 7 October 2022. Employment Judge Laidler sat alone.
The written judgment records that the application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written judgment states that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the applicable time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records only that the claimant's application for interim relief failed and was dismissed. It does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal or public interest disclosure claims. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.