Case 3308972/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Donna Sharlene Brownlie v B/E Aerospace (UK) Ltd - 1st Collins Aerospace, INC – 2nd Raytheon Technologies Corp – 3rd Ms Nathalie Vioules – 4th — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308972/2023
- Decision date
- 17 September 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Donna Sharlene Brownlie
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing at Watford Employment Tribunal on 26 July 2024, Employment Judge Bedeau determined a disability issue in case 3308972/2023. The record identifies the claimant as Ms Donna Sharlene Brownlie and the respondents as B/E Aerospace (UK) Ltd, Collins Aerospace, Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corp and Ms Nathalie Vioules.
The tribunal found that the claimant was, at all material times, a disabled person living with Anxiety and Depression. It also found that she was not disabled by reason of the mental condition Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder. This written record does not record any monetary award or other remedy determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary issue only. The tribunal found that the claimant was, at all material times, a disabled person living with Anxiety and Depression, and that she was not disabled by reason of Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder. | Other | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.