Case 3308987/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Jayshree Kotecha v British Airways plc and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 3308987/2023
- Decision date
- 12 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms Jayshree Kotecha
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place by telephone at Watford on 10 June 2024 before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone.
The tribunal recorded that the claimant's claim against the second respondent, Unite Union, was dismissed upon withdrawal. It also recorded that the claimant's claims for a redundancy payment and unauthorised deduction of wages were dismissed upon withdrawal.
No monetary remedy, legal reasoning, or further findings on the merits are set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim against the second respondent, Unite Union, was dismissed upon withdrawal; the specific legal basis of that claim is not identified in the text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.