Case 3309006/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Awan v Royal Mail Group Limited and 3 others — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309006/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms D Ballard, Ms H Edwards
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr M Awan
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claims at Reading over 30 September and 1, 2 and 3 October 2024 before Employment Judge Shastri-Hurst sitting with Ms D Ballard and Ms H Edwards.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims of direct race discrimination, victimisation, and unauthorised deduction of wages were each not well-founded and failed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set out further factual findings or reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claim of direct race discrimination was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records that the claim of victimisation was not well-founded and failed. The written judgment does not identify a protected characteristic for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claim of unauthorised deduction of wages was not well-founded and failed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.