Case 3309064/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R White v Tranquillity Space Limited (In Liquidation) and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309064/2022
- Decision date
- 20 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gumbiti-Zimuto Appearances
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr R White
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Mr White was not an employee of Tranquillity Space Limited.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claimant's complaints against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade. The written judgment does not set out separate written reasons or a monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The listing identifies a redundancy complaint, but the judgment does not separately particularise the complaints. It records that the claimant was not an employee of Tranquillity Space Limited and that the complaints against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The listing identifies an unlawful deduction from wages complaint, but the judgment does not separately particularise the complaints. It records that the claimant was not an employee of Tranquillity Space Limited and that the complaints against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The listing identifies a Working Time Regulations complaint, but the judgment does not separately particularise the complaints. It records that the claimant was not an employee of Tranquillity Space Limited and that the complaints against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The listing identifies a breach of contract complaint, but the judgment does not separately particularise the complaints. It records that the claimant was not an employee of Tranquillity Space Limited and that the complaints against the Secretary of State for Business and Trade were struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.