Case 3309117/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brown v AB Agri Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309117/2024
- Decision date
- 30 May 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bradford Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr A Brown, brought an unfair dismissal claim against AB Agri Limited. In this short judgment, Employment Judge Bradford dealt only with a limitation issue, not the merits of the dismissal claim.
The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was not presented within the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time. It also found that the claim was presented within a further reasonable period.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim would proceed. The judgment records no liability finding and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary time-limit ruling only. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was presented outside the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. The judgment states the claim will therefore proceed; no merits finding or remedy was recorded. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.