Case 3309190/2022 · Employment Tribunal
A Khosla v BDP Sales Prospecting Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309190/2022
- Decision date
- 12 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Read Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Khosla
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Read at a video hearing on 10 May 2023, with the judge sitting at Reading Tribunal Centre. The claimant, A Khosla, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's case in its entirety. The judgment states that the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction because the claim was outside the statutory time limits, and that it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have complied with those time limits.
The written record also notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant's case was dismissed in its entirety because the Employment Tribunal did not have jurisdiction as the claim was outside the statutory time limits and it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have complied. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.