Case 3309194/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v S Ripley T/a Amma Alterations — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309194/2022
- Decision date
- 31 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Bury St Edmunds on 25 January 2023, before Employment Judge K J Palmer sitting alone, the tribunal recorded that the claimant’s claims succeeded. The respondent was ordered to pay a redundancy payment of £3,491.25, unlawful deduction of wages of £1,387.00, holiday pay in lieu of accrued untaken holiday of £465.50, and damages for failure to give notice of £993.00.
The judgment does not set out written reasons because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the decision record. The total payable by the respondent to the claimant was £6,336.75.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,491 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that there had been an unlawful deduction and awards £1,387.00. | Upheld | — | £1,387 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded as holiday pay in lieu of accrued untaken holiday. | Upheld | — | £466 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded as damages for failure to give notice, calculated as 3.5 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £993 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,337
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.