Case 3309229/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Sadler v East Barnet School — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309229/2022
- Decision date
- 9 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brewer Representation
- Venue
- Watford ET
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Sadler
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 2 March 2023 before Employment Judge Brewer at Watford ET, with the claimant not in attendance and the respondent represented by Mr M Magee, Counsel, the tribunal considered whether the claim should remain in play. The judgment records that on 13 December 2022 the tribunal had made an Unless Order requiring the claimant to particularise his claims by 24 January 2023.
The claimant did not comply with that order. The tribunal therefore held that all of the claimant's claims were struck out under rule 37. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The short judgment records that all of the claimant's claims were struck out and does not set out the underlying particulars. This claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The short judgment records that all of the claimant's claims were struck out and does not set out the underlying particulars. This claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The short judgment records that all of the claimant's claims were struck out and does not set out the underlying particulars. This claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The short judgment records that all of the claimant's claims were struck out and does not set out the underlying particulars. This claim type is taken from the case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.