Case 3309252/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Cheng Yi Xia, the claimant in person For the v Mr Richard Crabtree - representative AMENDED — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309252/2022
- Decision date
- 11 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Daley Representation
- Venue
- Watford- video link
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Cheng Yi Xia, the claimant in person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms Cheng Yi Xia, brought a claim against Coyle Personnel Limited under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Employment Judge Daley heard the matter at Watford by video link on 22 February 2023, with the claimant appearing in person and Mr Richard Crabtree representing the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal struck out the claim under section 23 ERA 1996 because Coyle Personnel Limited was found not to be the correct respondent and there was found to be no contract between the claimant and respondent within section 230(a) and (b) ERA 1996. The judgment text also shows a second case number, 3301388/2022, on page 2, but the listed case reference for this decision is 3309252/2022. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 23 ERA 1996
- section 230(a) and (b) ERA 1996
- rule 37(1) Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.