Case 3309274/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Daniel Morris First v The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Second Respondent: Daniel Morris Technical Services Ltd (in voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309274/2022
- Decision date
- 21 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dick Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Daniel Morris First
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Watford by CVP on 21 September 2023 before Employment Judge Dick. The claimant did not appear and was not represented; the first respondent appeared by lay representative, and the second respondent did not appear and was not represented.
The tribunal dismissed all claims against both respondents under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 21 September 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under rule 47 because the claimant failed to attend the hearing on 21 September 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.