Case 3309278/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr John McArdle (legal executive) — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309278/2022
- Decision date
- 28 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt this preliminary hearing, Employment Judge Alliott considered whether the claimant's unfair dismissal and wages/breach of contract claims could proceed in light of limitation. The claimant had been dismissed with immediate effect on 11 November 2021 and paid 12 weeks' pay in lieu of notice. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim was presented on 11 July 2022, about five months after the three-month primary limit expired on 10 February 2022, and that the early conciliation period from 26 to 28 June 2022 did not extend that primary limit.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he suffered a mental health breakdown after being told of the dismissal, and accepted medical evidence that he had bipolar affective disorder and was under specialist care until late April 2022. On that basis, it found it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim by 10 February 2022. However, it found that by the end of April or beginning of May 2022 he was well enough to present a claim, and that the further delay until 11 July 2022 was not reasonable. The tribunal also found that any ignorance of time limits was not reasonable, noting that the claimant could have researched the position and had access to the internet at his library.
The unfair dismissal claim was therefore struck out for lack of jurisdiction, and the unauthorised deduction of wages and breach of contract claims were also struck out. The wages claim was said to relate to October 2012 and was described as clearly out of time. The tribunal did not determine the claimant's disability discrimination complaints about the refusal to hear appeals from 17 May 2022; it noted those refusals were in time and left open whether they formed part of a continuing course of conduct and whether time should be extended on a just and equitable basis at the full merits hearing.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out for no jurisdiction/time limits. The tribunal found the ET1 was issued about five months after the primary three-month limit and accepted mental-health evidence only up to late April 2022, but held the further delay after May 2022 was not justified. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal said this claim appeared to relate to October 2012 and was clearly out of time. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Included in the strike-out order with the wages claim. The reasons mention a six-year limitation period for breach of contract, but no separate factual date or award was set out. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- s.111(2)(b) ERA 1996
- reasonably practicable
- within such further period as the tribunal considers reasonable
- s.23 ERA 1996
- s.7 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- just and equitable basis
- s.33 Limitation Act factors
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.