Case 3309318/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Boyle v Satori Risk (in compulsory liquidation) — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309318/2023
- Decision date
- 14 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Boyle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal recorded that Satori Risk was in compulsory liquidation and that permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986. On that basis, the tribunal treated the claim as not able to proceed.
The tribunal also noted that on 4 June 2025 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The judgment therefore struck out the claim. No merits findings and no monetary award were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment does not determine the underlying merits. It strikes out the claim because the respondent was in compulsory liquidation and permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to continue; the claimant also failed to give an acceptable reason after being invited on 4 June 2025 to explain why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.