Case 3309361/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mrs Garvie, Non-Practicing Solicitor — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309361/2023
- Decision date
- 27 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Postle Appearances
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Norwich on 29 and 30 April 2024 before Employment Judge Postle. The claimant, Ms Beverley Curson, appeared in person and the respondent, APS Projects Limited, was represented by Mrs Garvie, a non-practising solicitor.
The judgment records that the parties reached a settlement on the second day of the hearing. Under that settlement, the respondent agreed to pay the claimant £15,000 in full and final settlement by 27 May 2024.
The judgment also states that if no application was made on or before that date to restore the proceedings, the claimant's claims against the respondent would stand dismissed. No findings on liability or separate remedy components were set out in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The parties reached a settlement on the second day of the hearing. The judgment records that the Respondent agreed to pay £15,000 in full and final settlement by 27 May 2024, and that if no application to restore the proceedings was made by that date, the Claimant's claims would stand dismissed. | Settled | — | £15,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £15,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.