Case 3309373/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T R Megenis-Clarke Respondent 1: Sarah Louise Packwood Respondent 2: Nourish Olney Ltd (dissolved) Respondent 3: Sarah Packwood v S L Packwood and Others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309373/2023
- Decision date
- 11 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Graham Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T R Megenis-Clarke Respondent 1: Sarah Louise Packwood Respondent 2: Nourish Olney Ltd (dissolved) Respondent 3: Sarah Packwood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Graham heard the case at Bury St Edmunds by CVP on 11 April 2025. The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed because the Claimant had less than two years' continuous service at the time of dismissal, so the tribunal did not award any remedy on that claim.
The tribunal also removed Nourish Olney Ltd from the proceedings because it was a dissolved company and there had been no application to restore it to the Register of Companies. The complaints described as unpaid wages / notice pay were struck out as an abuse of process because the Claimant already had a County Court judgment in her favour dated 6 September 2023. No tribunal monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the Claimant had less than two years' continuous service at the time of dismissal. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers collectively to 'complaints for unpaid wages / notice pay' and strikes those complaints out as an abuse of process because the Claimant already had a County Court judgment dated 6 September 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers collectively to 'complaints for unpaid wages / notice pay' and strikes those complaints out as an abuse of process because the Claimant already had a County Court judgment dated 6 September 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- abuse of process
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.