Case 3309400/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Elia v Freddie's Cakes Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309400/2023
- Decision date
- 27 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Quill Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Elia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Quill determined the case under Rule 21. The tribunal found that Freddie's Cakes Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Miss M Elia's wages and ordered the respondent to pay £952 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £500.
The unfair dismissal and redundancy pay claims were dismissed. The reason given was that the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment, so those claims could not succeed. The judgment records no further remedy beyond the two monetary awards on the wages and holiday claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and awarded £952 gross. | Upheld | — | £952 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £500. | Upheld | — | £500 |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed because the claimant did not have two years' continuous employment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,452
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.