Case 3309432/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Matthew Coverley v Ministry of Defence RECORD OF A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309432/2023
- Decision date
- 23 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Moore
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Matthew Coverley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Matthew Coverley brought a race discrimination claim under s.13 Equality Act 2010 concerning rejected RAF applications in 2020 and 2022, together with a 2023 service complaint. At this preliminary hearing the Ministry of Defence accepted that s.21 EqA did not apply because the claimant was not serving when the alleged acts occurred, and the only live issue was whether the 2020 and 2022 complaints were out of time under s.123 EqA.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence that he did not know until about 29 June 2023 that the RAF had applied a policy involving the pull-forward of female and ethnic minority candidates, and that he had no reason earlier to suspect discrimination in the rejection of his applications. It found the August 2022 and February 2023 media reports were less likely to have alerted him, and accepted that he was on an intensive flying course in February 2023. The tribunal also noted that he acted quickly once aware of the issue, filing a service complaint on 11 July 2023 and starting Early Conciliation on 27 July 2023.
Applying the just and equitable discretion under s.123(1) EqA and referring to Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link, the tribunal held that time should be extended for both the 2020 and 2022 race discrimination complaints. It considered the delay, the respondent’s prejudice argument, and the fact that much of the relevant evidence had been preserved in the respondent’s internal investigation, and concluded that the claims should proceed to a full hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Preliminary ruling only: the tribunal extended time for the complaint about the 2020 employment application so it can proceed to a full hearing; merits were not decided. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Race discrimination | Preliminary ruling only: the tribunal extended time for the complaint about the 2022 employment application so it can proceed to a full hearing; merits were not decided. | Upheld | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.123(1) EqA
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre t/a Leisure Link
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.