Case 3309441/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Rux-Burton v Rux-Burton Associates Ltd c/oBegbies Traynor and Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309441/2023
- Decision date
- 24 September 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Date
Parties
2 namedKey findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with claims numbered 3309441/2023 and 3309442/2023. It stated that both were duplicates of claims 3309436/2023 and 3309437/2023, in which judgment had already been entered.
On that basis, the tribunal struck out the claims as an abuse of process. No substantive liability findings or monetary award were made in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Claim number 3309441/2023 was struck out because the tribunal said it duplicated claim numbers 3309436/2023 and 3309437/2023, in which judgment had already been entered; the tribunal described this as an abuse of process. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claim number 3309442/2023 was struck out because the tribunal said it duplicated claim numbers 3309436/2023 and 3309437/2023, in which judgment had already been entered; the tribunal described this as an abuse of process. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.