Case 3309492/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Coakley v All Metal Roofing Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309492/2023
- Decision date
- 3 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cowen
- Venue
- Watford
- Panel members
- Ms L Jaffe, Mr A Scott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Coakley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard claims brought by Mr T Coakley against All Metal Roofing Limited at Watford before Employment Judge Cowen, Ms L Jaffe and Mr A Scott.
The written judgment records that the claimant's claims for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination were dismissed. It states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would only be provided if requested, so the written record does not set out the tribunal's reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed; oral reasons are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The written judgment states that the disability discrimination claim was dismissed; oral reasons are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.