Case 3309493/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr Alex Tait, Director — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309493/2023
- Decision date
- 8 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Ord Appearances
- Venue
- Huntingdon
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a consent judgment at Huntingdon on 1 February 2024 before Employment Judge M Ord. The judgment records no findings on liability. Instead, it states that the parties agreed the Respondent would pay the Claimant, Mr Shaun Smith, £8,500 in full and final settlement of all claims.
The order required payment by 22 February 2024. No reasons, legal tests, or itemised heads of loss are given in the judgment text, and no separate award is broken down between any underlying claims.
Because the judgment is by consent, the tribunal did not adjudicate the merits of the dispute in the text provided. The only recorded outcome is settlement of all claims for the agreed sum of £8,500.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the parties agreed the Respondent would pay £8,500 in full and final settlement of all claims. The underlying claim types are not identified in the judgment text. | Settled | — | £8,500 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,500
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.