Case 3309559/2022 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Mr Singh — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309559/2022
- Decision date
- 26 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Freshwater Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought an unfair dismissal claim against Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company. By consent, the respondent's name was amended to Felixstowe Dock and Railway Company. The tribunal did not determine the merits of any dismissal complaint because it held that the unfair dismissal claim was out of time.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within the normal time limit and that it would not be reasonable to extend time. On that basis, it held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim, and the claim was not upheld.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the unfair dismissal claim was presented out of time. It found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within time and that it would not be reasonable to extend time. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.