Case 3309573/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A F Marin v Pioneer FM Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309573/2022
- Decision date
- 25 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A F Marin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the remedy hearing before Judge Cowx sitting alone on 14 March 2023, the tribunal found Mr A F Marin's claim of unfair dismissal under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded. It awarded a basic award of £2,448 and a compensatory award of £10,500, making a total unfair dismissal award of £12,948. The tribunal recorded that the recoupment regulations did not apply because the unfair dismissal award was made upon the agreement of the parties and with their consent.
The tribunal also found that the respondent was in breach of contract in relation to 1 month's notice pay and ordered damages of £3,750, calculated using gross pay to reflect the likelihood of taxation as Post Employment Notice Pay. It further found that wages had not been paid and ordered £3,750, and that holiday pay had not been paid and ordered £3,634.60, in each case calculating the sum using gross monthly pay and requiring deductions for income tax and National Insurance.
Finally, the tribunal found that the respondent had breached its duty under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 to provide full and accurate written particulars of employment. It ordered payment of £1,730.76, described as the amount equal to 2 weeks' pay. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons would be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual tribunal procedure.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under Part X Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £2,448 and a compensatory award of £10,500, making a total unfair dismissal award of £12,948. | Upheld | — | £12,948 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract claim for 1 month's notice pay. Damages were calculated using gross pay to reflect possible taxation as Post Employment Notice Pay. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unpaid wages. The tribunal ordered payment of £3,750, calculated using gross monthly pay with deductions for income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,750 |
| Holiday pay | Claim for unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal ordered payment of £3,634.60, calculated using gross monthly pay with deductions for income tax and National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £3,635 |
| Other | The tribunal found a breach of section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 for failure to provide full and accurate written particulars of employment and awarded £1,730.76, equal to 2 weeks' pay. | Upheld | — | £1,731 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £25,813
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,448
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £10,500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.