Case 3309632/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Nezhla Ibryam v Needplan Staffing International Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309632/2022
- Decision date
- 22 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Nezhla Ibryam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment: the time for presenting a response had expired on 2 September 2022 and no response had been presented, so Employment Judge Alliott decided the case on the available material. The claimant, Mrs Nezhla Ibryam, worked for the respondent from 25 April to 27 June 2022. The tribunal recorded that her gross wage was £519 per week with a 3% pension allowance, that she was entitled to reimbursement of work-related expenses, and that her holiday entitlement was 30 days per year. It also found that she took no holiday.
On that material, the tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £4,774.80 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. It also found a breach of contract and ordered damages of £141.68 for pension allowance, £395.19 for expenses, and £91.36 for a course refund. The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £519 gross, subject to tax and national insurance deductions.
The combined monetary total from the judgment is £5,922.03. The judgment did not record any discrimination, unfair dismissal, or whistleblowing findings, and no legal tests were expressly cited in the extracted text. The listed hearing on 30 May 2023 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £4,774.80, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £4,775 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent was in breach of contract and ordered damages of £141.68 for pension allowance at 3%, £395.19 for expenses, and £91.36 for a course refund. | Upheld | — | £628 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £519, subject to tax and national insurance deductions. | Upheld | — | £519 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,922
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.