Case 3309635/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr D Heath (owner of the company) — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309635/2023
- Decision date
- 8 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting alone before Employment Judge Alliott on 8 May 2024, held that Heath Electrical Services MK Limited had made unauthorised deductions from Mr Stephen Hannam's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay him the net sum of £3,405. The written record states that the judgment was given orally at the hearing, so no written reasons are included in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £3,405. Written reasons were not provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £3,405 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant's claim for accrued holiday entitlement was dismissed. Written reasons were not provided in the record because reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,405
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.