Case 3309649/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Tsangari v Sabio HR Consultancy Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309649/2022
- Decision date
- 18 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T Brown
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Tsangari
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge T Brown sat alone at Bury St Edmunds by Cloud Video Platform on 18 July 2023. The claimant, Mr G Tsangari, appeared in person. The respondent, Sabio HR Consultancy Limited, was not present or represented, and no response was accepted.
The tribunal made a single monetary finding: it declared that the claimant had suffered unauthorised deductions from his wages in the sum of £1,229.75. The judgment ordered the respondent to pay that amount to the claimant, subject to any deductions required by law in respect of tax or National Insurance.
No other claims, legal tests, or remedy components are set out in the written judgment. The record notes that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the claimant suffered unauthorised deductions from his wages in the sum of £1,229.75 and ordered the respondent to pay that sum, subject to deductions required by law for tax or National Insurance. | Upheld | — | £1,230 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,230
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.