Case 3309656/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K George v University of Hertfordshire and 1 other — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309656/2023
- Decision date
- 1 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Matthews Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Ms K George
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management order sent on 1 July 2025, the Tribunal gave the Claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reasons identified were that the Claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 10 March 2025 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Claimant did not make representations in writing and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal held that a fair hearing was no longer possible and therefore struck out the Claimant's claim.
After the Claimant's claim was struck out, the Respondent's breach of contract claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the Claimant's claim after a case management order sent on 1 July 2025 gave an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing; the Claimant had not complied with the order dated 10 March 2025, the claim had not been actively pursued, and no representations were made. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The Respondent's breach of contract claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the Respondent. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.