Case 3309665/2022 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Mr S Peacock, Solicitor — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309665/2022
- Decision date
- 24 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tynan Members
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Mrs W Smith, Mr S Holford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Cambridge heard Mrs C Fadipe's claims against Active Learning Trust on 15, 16, 17 and 18 April 2024, with judgment given on 22 April 2024. The written record states that the tribunal's decision was unanimous.
The tribunal held that the claimant's claim that she was unfairly constructively dismissed was not well founded and dismissed it. It also held that her various claims that she was discriminated against by reason of disability were not well founded and dismissed those claims.
The written judgment record does not set out detailed reasons because oral reasons were given at the hearing. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment refers to the claimant's 'various claims' of disability discrimination but does not list the individual allegations separately; extracted as one disability discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.