Case 3309700/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M A Elbadry v Cocina 'El mexicana ' — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309700/2022
- Decision date
- 8 August 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M A Elbadry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 16 June 2025, the tribunal gave Mr Elbadry an opportunity to make written representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make any sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim.
The extract contains no merits findings and records no monetary award. It is an administrative disposal only, approved by Employment Judge M Warren on 8 August 2025 and sent to the parties on 28 August 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The extract only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the disability discrimination heading is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The extract only states that 'the claim' was struck out because it had not been actively pursued; the race discrimination heading is taken from the case listing context. | Struck out | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.