Case 3309714/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs O Kovtun v Aneetra Keen and 2 others — 2025
- Case reference
- 3309714/2023
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bansal Representation
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Mrs O Kovtun
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs O Kovtun presented a claim on 11 August 2023 alleging race discrimination against Aneetra Keen, Sue Seymour and The Freemantle Trust. The judgment records that the claimant had previously been represented, but after her representative came off record there was no further communication from her, and she did not reply to the tribunal's request for an email address.
A hearing listed for 28 February 2025 proceeded by CVP as a preliminary case management hearing. The tribunal noted that the notice of hearing was sent to the address on the claim form, that there had been no correspondence from the claimant, and that she did not attend. The clerk contacted the claimant by telephone and was told that she was not aware of any tribunal claim or of the hearing, and did not know The Freemantle Trust.
At the hearing, the tribunal granted the application to add The Freemantle Trust as a respondent. The tribunal then considered the respondent's application for an unless order and, in the alternative, dismissal under rule 47. Applying rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, and taking account of the claimant's non-attendance, the lack of any communication from her, and the interests of justice, the tribunal decided it could not continue with the case management hearing in her absence.
The claim was therefore dismissed under rule 47 for non-attendance. The judgment records no substantive findings on the race discrimination allegation and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The claimant presented an ET1 on 11 August 2023 alleging race discrimination against the named respondents. The tribunal did not determine the merits; it dismissed the claim under rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant did not attend the hearing on 28 February 2025. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.