Case 3309722/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Magalhaes Vilas Boas v Flash Capital Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309722/2023
- Decision date
- 5 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Magalhaes Vilas Boas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing at Watford on 29 May 2024, before Regional Employment Judge Foxwell, the claimant, Miss J Magalhaes Vilas Boas, appeared in person and the respondent, Flash Capital Limited, was represented by its director, Mr E Ward. The tribunal dealt with the claimant's unpaid wages complaint as a claim for unlawful deduction from wages.
The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent. On that basis, the claim for unpaid wages failed and was dismissed. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
The written judgment does not record any monetary award, and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant was not an employee or worker of the respondent, so her claim for unpaid wages was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.