Case 3309725/2023 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v L D Crosbie — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309725/2023
- Decision date
- 22 July 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Summer Weldon, worked as a chef at the Raven public house from 1 May 2023 to 11 July 2023 under verbal terms only and without a written contract or wage slips. The respondent did not file a response and did not attend the hearing. The claimant gave evidence on oath and showed the tribunal some documents, including an email dated 1 August 2023 requesting wages and bank statements showing payments from L Crosbie with the reference “The Raven”.
The tribunal accepted the claimant’s uncontested evidence that she had not been paid for her final week of work. It found that the respondent was her employer and had unlawfully deducted £231 from her wages in breach of s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal upheld the unlawful deductions from wages claim and ordered the respondent to pay £231, less any deductions for tax and national insurance, within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
The separate claim for unpaid holiday pay was dismissed. Although the claimant said she had been employed for just over two months and had taken some holiday, she could not explain how much holiday she was entitled to, how much she had taken, or how much holiday pay remained due. The tribunal offered a short adjournment so she could try to obtain the information, but she said she would not be able to provide it. On that basis, the tribunal said it could not make a decision on whether holiday pay had accrued and remained outstanding at the end of employment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages in the final week of employment. The award was calculated as £121 for 9 July 2023 (11 hours at £11 per hour) and £110 for 11 July 2023 (10 hours at £11 per hour). | Upheld | — | £231 |
| Holiday pay | The claimant alleged unpaid holiday pay for 14 days, but she could not say how much holiday she was entitled to, how much she had taken, or how much remained outstanding. The tribunal said it could not decide the claim on the material provided. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £231
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £231
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.13(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.