Case 3309739/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs. J Gallagher v v Royal Mencap Society — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309739/2022
- Decision date
- 6 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren
- Panel members
- Ms B Osbourne, Mr P Hough
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs. J Gallagher v
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal sat at Watford by CVP on 29, 30 and 31 January 2024 before Employment Judge Warren, Ms B Osbourne and Mr P Hough. The claimant, Mrs J Gallagher, appeared in person and the respondent, Royal Mencap Society, was represented by counsel. The tribunal’s unanimous decision was that the constructive unfair dismissal claim under sections 94 and 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was ill founded and dismissed.
The tribunal also dismissed the disability discrimination claims. These were recorded as a section 15 Equality Act 2010 claim, a failure to make reasonable adjustments claim under sections 20 and 21, and a victimisation claim under section 27. Each was found to be ill founded and dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal’s notice. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment records a claim of constructive unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 95 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It was found to be ill founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a section 15 Equality Act 2010 disability discrimination claim. It was found to be ill founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment records a failure to make reasonable adjustments claim under sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010. It was found to be ill founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | The judgment records a victimisation claim under section 27 Equality Act 2010. It was found to be ill founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- sections 94 and 95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- sections 20 and 21 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.