Case 3309766/2022 · Employment Tribunal
No attendance For the v Conexim Solutions Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3309766/2022
- Decision date
- 13 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
No attendance For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant's ET1 advanced claims for unfair dismissal and age discrimination, but it was described as perfunctory and sparse. EJ Laidler had previously ordered the claimant to specify each matter relied upon for unfair dismissal and age discrimination, but no adequate particulars were provided. The tribunal also recorded that a fuller merits hearing had been listed later in September 2023, but the case remained at an early stage and the claim details still had not been set out.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim was struck out because the tribunal found it had not been actively pursued and no particulars had been provided despite an order requiring them. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The age discrimination claim was also struck out for the same reason: the tribunal recorded that no proper details of the claim had been provided and the claim had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | Age | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(4d) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.