Case 3309820/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Weston v Keystage Housing Luton — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309820/2022
- Decision date
- 4 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maxwell Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Weston
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 4 February 2023, the claimant was told the tribunal was considering striking out her claims because of failure to comply with earlier case management orders. She was given until 20 February 2023 to explain why the claims should not be struck out and to confirm compliance with all outstanding orders, but she did not reply.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claims under rule 37(1)(c) of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2013 for failure to comply with case management orders, including those made on 6 November 2022, and under rule 37(1)(d) because the claimant was not actively pursuing the claims. The judgment records no substantive determination of liability and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers to the claimant's 'claims' generally and does not list individual causes of action; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment refers to the claimant's 'claims' generally and does not list individual causes of action; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 37(1)(c)
- rule 37(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.