Case 3309836/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Pickering v Sew on and sew forth Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309836/2022
- Decision date
- 5 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Wood Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Pickering
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal adopted a weekly net income figure of £334 for the claimant and a gross weekly figure of £417.50. On that basis, it found that Mr M Pickering had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,479, net of tax.
It also found that the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,505. The claim for holiday entitlement was dismissed because there was inadequate information in relation to that part of the claim. The total monetary outcome of the judgment was therefore £3,984.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,479, net of tax. It adopted a weekly net income figure of £334 and a gross weekly figure of £417.50. | Upheld | — | £1,479 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £2,505. | Upheld | — | £2,505 |
| Holiday pay | The holiday entitlement claim was dismissed because there was inadequate information in relation to that aspect of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,984
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.