Case 3309862/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Hicks v Standard Numismatic Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309862/2022
- Decision date
- 5 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Hicks
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was determined under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. Employment Judge Tobin decided that a determination could properly be made on the papers.
The tribunal declared that Standard Numismatic Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Mr S Hicks's wages. The deductions related to unpaid wages, unpaid commission and unpaid accrued holiday for the period February 2022 to April 2022.
The respondent was ordered to pay Mr Hicks the gross sum of £8,673.89. No separate award breakdown, interest award or other remedy was recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions in relation to unpaid wages, unpaid commission and unpaid accrued holiday for February 2022 to April 2022. | Upheld | — | £8,674 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,674
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £8,674
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.