Case 3309903/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Aslett v Value Retail Management (Bicester Village) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 3309903/2022
- Decision date
- 11 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Aslett
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Reading on 16 May 2023, Employment Judge Anstis, sitting alone, struck out the claimant's claims of unfair dismissal, whistleblowing detriments (or dismissal), wrongful dismissal (notice pay), and any other claim for unpaid wages or benefits against Value Retail Management (Bicester Village) Ltd.
The written record contains only the strike-out orders and does not set out the tribunal's substantive reasons. It notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the decision being sent. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a claim of whistleblowing detriments (or dismissal). | Struck out | — | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment identifies this as wrongful dismissal (notice pay). | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | The judgment also struck out any other claim for unpaid wages or benefits. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.