Case 3309944/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Sara Oliwkiewicz v Julia Polski Sklep Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3309944/2021
- Decision date
- 30 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Sara Oliwkiewicz
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been provided by the respondent, so the tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. Judgment was entered for the claimant on her claims for outstanding wages, outstanding holiday pay, and notice pay.
The unfair dismissal claim did not succeed. Employment Judge Tobin recorded that the claimant did not have the statutory two-year continuous service needed for a complaint of unfair dismissal, and that claim was dismissed.
The extracted judgment does not set out any monetary figures, separate awards, or a total sum. It records only the substantive outcomes on liability for the wage, holiday pay, notice pay, and unfair dismissal claims.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment entered for the claimant in respect of outstanding wages. No monetary figure appears in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment entered for the claimant in respect of outstanding holiday pay. No monetary figure appears in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment entered for the claimant in respect of notice pay. The extract does not use wrongful dismissal terminology, so this is classified as breach of contract. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed because the claimant did not have the statutory two-year continuous service required for that complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.