Case 3309967/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Dobson v British Airways plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 3309967/2022
- Decision date
- 24 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anstis
- Venue
- Reading
- Panel members
- Ms A Crosby, Mr F Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Dobson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that he was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the claimant succeeded in his disability discrimination complaints concerning unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability and failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of night work. Other complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability were dismissed.
The parties reached an agreement on remedy for the successful complaints, and the claimant sought no further order. The tribunal made no further order in respect of remedy.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments in respect of night work was well-founded and succeeded. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that any other complaint of failure to make reasonable adjustments for disability was not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.