Case 3309988/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Vosper v DPD Group UK Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3309988/2021
- Decision date
- 10 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Warren Representation
- Venue
- Norwich
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Vosper
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the Claimant's claim. The judgment records that the grounds were that the Claimant's conduct of the proceedings had been vexatious and unreasonable, that the Claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 11 September 2022, and that the claim was not being actively pursued.
No remedy was awarded in this judgment. The judgment states that written reasons had been requested and would follow in due course.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the claim was struck out because the Claimant's conduct of the proceedings had been vexatious and unreasonable, the Claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 11 September 2022, and the claim was not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.