Case 3310020/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Stephen Collier v JCW Energy Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310020/2021
- Decision date
- 31 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Foxwell Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Stephen Collier
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing on 8 July 2022, Regional Employment Judge Foxwell considered the claimant's breach of contract complaint against JCW Energy Services Limited. The tribunal held that the complaint was presented outside the time limit in regulations 7 and 8B of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claim to have been presented within time. On that basis, the tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the breach of contract claim and dismissed it.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Presented outside the time limit in regulations 7 and 8B of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time and therefore it had no jurisdiction. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulations 7 and 8B of the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.