Case 3310024/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ahmed v CSS Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 3310024/2021
- Decision date
- 2 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord’s Notice
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ahmed
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr A Ahmed's claim against CSS Ltd. The reasons record that, by a letter dated 1 July 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing about whether the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with Employment Judge Ord's notice dated 1 July 2022, had not actively pursued the claim, and had failed to attend the case management hearing listed for 1 July 2022 to consider the respondent's strike-out application.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the tribunal said the claim should be struck out. The extracted text does not set out the underlying substantive causes of action, and it records no remedy or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment text does not identify the underlying substantive complaint(s); it only records that 'the claim' was struck out. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.