Case 3310036/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Stewart v Civil Nuclear Constabulary — 2025
- Case reference
- 3310036/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Stewart
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 19 November 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim. The warning was given because it appeared, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's Order dated 20 June 2025 and/or the claim had not been actively pursued.
The letter gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant did not reply, and Employment Judge Childe was satisfied that the grounds for strike out under Rule 38 applied and that striking out the claim was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states only that 'the claim is struck out' and does not identify the specific pleaded claim type in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.