Case 3310037/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Powell v Civil Nuclear Constabulary — 2025
- Case reference
- 3310037/2024
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Powell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the Tribunal wrote to the claimant on 19 November 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim. The warning was given because it appeared that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 20 June 2025 and/or that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing, but did not reply. Employment Judge Childe was satisfied that the grounds for strike out under Rule 38 applied and that strike out was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The one-page judgment states that the claim is struck out. The listing category identifies Equal Pay Act, but the judgment does not give substantive details of the equal pay claim. | Struck out | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The one-page judgment states that the claim is struck out. The listing category identifies Public Interest Disclosure, but the judgment does not give substantive details of the whistleblowing claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.